Table 1.
Method | Advantages | Disadvantages | References |
---|---|---|---|
NMR | - Simple sample preparation -Excellent reproducibility -Quantify a wide-range of organic compounds in the micro-molar range |
-Low sensitivity compared with MS methods - Suitable for quantification of metabolites present in relatively high concentration |
(102, 103) |
GC-MS | - High separation efficiency - The oldest and a robust tool for qualitative metabolic profiling |
-Non-volatile matrices require additional preparation - Some gases are challenging (CO2, N2, O2, Ar, CO, H2O) |
(104, 105) |
LC-MS | - High separation efficiency - No derivatization is needed for the analysis of polar or high molecular weight metabolites - Quick analysis of small samples |
- Ion suppression | (103, 106) |
CE-MS | -Suitable for the separation of polar and charged compounds - Powerful for charged metabolites -High-analyte resolution – providing information mainly on polar or ionic compounds -Short analysis time -Very small sample requirement |
- Poor concentration sensitivity | (107, 108) |
HPLC-MS | -Robustness -Ease of use - Good selectivity -Adjustable sensitivity |
-Lack of efficiency due to low diffusion coefficients in liquid phase | (109, 110) |
UPLC-MS | -Powerful technique in biomolecular research - Covers a number of polar metabolites and enlarges the number of detected analytes -Better efficiency with speedy analysis |
Less time life of columns | (107, 111) |