Skip to main content
. 2013 Apr 30;2013(4):CD008370. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008370.pub3

Montorsi 1995.

Methods Randomised clinical trial (parallel design)
Participants Country: Italy 
 Sample size: 278 
 Post‐randomisation drop‐out: 60 
 Revised sample size: 218 
 Females: 87 (39.9%) 
 Mean age: 58.2 years 
 Malignancy: 139 (63.8%) 
 Chronic pancreatitis: 18 (8.3%) 
 Pancreatoduodenectomy: 143 (65.6%) 
 Follow‐up: not reported
Inclusion criteria: 
 1. Elective pancreatic resection for neoplastic or chronic inflammatory disease of the pancreas and the periampullary region 
 2. Aged 18‐75 years 
 3. ASA I or II
Exclusion criteria: 
 1. People with ongoing acute pancreatitis 
 2. Treatment with octreotide or native somatostatin within the last 48 h
Interventions The participants were randomly assigned to 2 groups 
 Group 1: octreotide (n = 111) 
 Further details: 100 μg sc 3 times daily for 7 days starting 1 h before operation 
 Group 2: placebo (n = 107) 
 Further details: equal volume, frequency and duration as intervention
Outcomes The outcomes reported were mortality and perioperative morbidity
Notes Reasons for post‐randomisation drop‐out: unresectable (n = 54); protocol violations (n = 6) 
 Pancreatic fistula definition: amylase‐rich fluid (amylase more than 3 times normal serum concentration) collected from the peripancreatic abdominal drainage since the postoperative day 3, with a drainage volume of greater than 10 mL/day (grade A)
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Quote: "octreotide or placebo was started in a double‐blind fashion, 1 hour before operation, as follows: 1 ml (100 mcg octreotide or placebo) every 8 hours subcutaneously for 7 days"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Comment: post‐randomisation drop‐outs were related to the outcomes
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: important outcomes were reported
Free of source of funding bias? Unclear risk Comment: this information was not available