Wethers 1994.
| Methods | Design trial: parallel (2 groups). Multicenter study: yes Study phase: no described. Follow‐up period: 10 weeks. Baseline observation period: none declared. Randomisation unit: patients. Unit of analysis: patients. Intention‐to‐treat analysis: yes. | |
| Participants | Randomised: 55 (RGD peptide matrix: 32) / placebo (23).
Hb genotype: HbSS (50), HbSP thalassaemia (2), HbSC(1), HbSC Harlem (1), HbSD (1). Completed study: 48 (87%). RDG peptide matrix (27/32 = 84%), placebo (21/23 = 91%) Loss: 7 (RGD peptide matrix: 5/32:16% ) / placebo (2/23:9%). Imbalance between both groups: 7% Age: median(± SE) and range: RGD peptide matrix: 32.9(1.8) years, range 18 ‐ 65 years; placebo: 36.6(2.3) years, range 26 ‐ 65 years. Baseline ulcer duration (months) median(± SE) and range: RGD peptide matrix: 52.0 months (12.6), range 1 ‐ 312; placebo: 45.9 months (12.4), range 1 ‐ 192). Baseline ulcer area (cm2) median(±SE) and range: RGD peptide matrix: 14.8(3.3), range 0.4 ‐91.3; placebo: 11.0(2.4), range 0.9‐36.7. Gender (male: female): RGD peptide matrix: 21:11; placebo: 12:11. Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
|
|
| Interventions | RGD peptide matrix (Argidene gel: formerly Telio‐Derm gel, Telios Pharmaceuticals, Inc, San Diego, CA).
Applications and dressing changes: once per week by 10 weeks. Placebo: saline solution. Applications and dressing changes: once per week by 10 weeks. Co‐intervention: debridament and cleaning at each visit. |
|
| Outcomes | Primary: changes in per cent ulcer closure. Secondary: none declared. | |
| Notes | Country: conducted at USA. Sample size estimation a priori: no. Support: Telios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Founder role: none declared. | |
| Risk of bias | ||
| Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
| Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Quote "sequentially assigned to treatment groups based on a unique randomization number list" (page 1776). Comments: imbalance exists on 'baseline ulcer area (cm2 ). No Information reported about how "unique randomization number list" was generated. |
| Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Insufficient information to permit judgement of ‘low risk’ or ‘high risk’. |
| Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patient and outcome assessor were blinded. |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Patient and outcome assessor were blinded. |
| Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Dropouts < 20% |
| Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | ‐ |
| Other bias | High risk | Design bias (Appendix 2). |
bd: twice a day SD: standard deviation SE: standard error