Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 20;28(2):213–220. doi: 10.3233/THC-192024

Table 1.

Results of the five measurements in the three experimental conditions

Telephone-instructed CPR (n= 17) Video-instructed CPR (n= 14) Video-instructed CPR with filming protocol (n= 18)
Depth of compressions 26.00 [mm] 25.00 [mm] p= 0.28 compared with t-CPR 26.00 [mm] p= 0.37 compared with t-CPR
p= 0.92 compared with v-CPR
Rhythm 103.00 [BPM] 100.00 [BPM] p= 0.95 compared with t-CPR 107.50 [BPM] p= 0.25 compared with t-CPR
p= 0.16 compared with v-CPR
Hands placed correctly in the centre of patient’s chest 62.94% 71.36% p< 0.05 compared with t-CPR* 73.17% p< 0.05 compared with t-CPR*
p= 0.20 compared with v-CPR
Percentage of time chest compressions were done with correct rhythm 54.18% 47.29% p< 0.05 compared with t-CPR* 53.61% p= 0.70 compared with t-CPR
p< 0.05 compared with v-CPR*
Full release of the chest after each compression 74.65% 61% p< 0.05 compared with t-CPR* 81.56% p= 0.43 compared with t-CPR
p< 0.05 compared with v-CPR*

Values are presented as percentages or quantitatively. Percentages were compared using a test. Quantitative variables were compared using a Mann-Whitney U test. Significant differences are marked with *.