Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0231720. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231720

Table 2. Comparison of first UPSIT score and mean of all UPSIT scores with visual hallucinations and parkinsonism as predictors of ADD/DLB vs ADD.

Predictor Sensitivity Specificity Accuracy Odds Ratio (95% CI), p-value AUC P-value
First UPSIT1 93.1% 64.6% 71.2% 17.5 (5.1, 91.6) < .0001 82.9% 0.24193
Matched Year hallucinations1 17.2% 96.9% 78.4% 4.4 (0.9, 25.0) 0.0905 67.4% 0.00124
Matched Year parkinsonism1 31.0% 77.1% 66.4% 1.7 (0.7, 4.3) 0.2648 67.4% 0.00064
Mean UPSIT2 86.2% 71.9% 75.2% 18.0 (6.0, 66.8) < .0001 87.2% 0.24193
Cumulative hallucinations2 51.7% 76.0% 70.4% 3.3 (1.4, 8.4) 0.0106 72.9% 0.0084
Cumulative parkinsonism2 65.5% 45.8% 50.4% 1.6 (0.7, 3.9) 0.3001 68.2% 0.00074

“Matched” indicates that determinations of the presence or absence of hallucinations and parkinsonism were done close to the same year as the first UPSIT examination.

1. Adjusted for matched year MMSE and age at first UPSIT.

2. Adjusted for mean MMSE and age at death.

3. P-value comparing AUCs for first and mean UPSIT.

4. P-value comparing AUC with first UPSIT.

5. P-value comparing AUC with mean UPSIT.