Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;15(4):e0230914. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230914

Table 1. Summary of study characteristics and study outcomes of articles comparing different age groups of patients (older vs. younger patients) receiving surgery for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Ref. Study design and time frame Type of intervention Number of patients Metastasis characteristics Neoadjuvant chemotherapy Morbidity rate Mortality rate R0 resection OS DFS Predictors of morbidity and survival
Nagano et al. 2005 Retrospective cohort study
1992–2004
Liver resection 212
Older (≥70 yo) = 62
Younger (<70 yo) = 150
Single nodule: 34/61 Older patients vs. 93/150 Younger
Metachronous lesion: 35/61 Older patients vs. 74/150 Younger (NSD)
Maximum tumor size: 43.8 mm for Older vs. 35.8 mm for Younger (p = 0.071)
Neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion
Older: 11.3% Younger: 16%
(p = 0.377)
Older: 19.7%
Younger: 23.3%
(p = 0.562)
Older: 0%
Younger: 0.49%
Older: 48.1%
Younger: 52.2%
(NSD)
1-, 3-, 5-year OS
Older: 79.4%, 46.5%,, 34.1%
Younger: 90.6%, 62.8%, 53.1%
(p = 0.01)
5-year DFS: Older: 50.7%
Younger : 46.5%
(NSD)
• The rate of non treatment for hepatic recurrence was higher in Older patients than that in younger patients (29.2% versus 10.6%; p = 0.04)
Advanced chronologic age cannot be regarded as a medical contraindication to hepatic resection for CRLM in patients ≥70 years.
Figueras et al. 2007 Retrospective cohort study
1990–2006
Liver resection 648
Older (≥70 yo) = 160
Younger (<70 yo) = 488
Synchronous metastases: 39% of Older vs. 49% of Younger (p = 0.036)
Isolated CRLM: 51% of Older vs. 42% of Younger (p = 0.03).
Size of the CRLM: 4.2±2.6 cm for Older vs. 3.7±2.1 cm for Younger (p = 0.009).
Lesions larger than 10 cm: 5% of Older vs. 1% of Younger
Older: 20%
Younger: 27%
(p = 0.06)
Older: 41%
Younger: 34%
(p = 0.008)
Older: 8%
Younger: 3%
(p = 0.008)
Older: 85% 1-, 3-, 5-year OS:
Older:
82%, 48%, 36%
Younger: 88%, 62%, 45%
(p = 0.0069)
1-, 3-, 5-year DFS:
Older: 68%, 34%, 30% for
Younger: 68%, 32%, 25%
(p = 0.71)
• Only tumoral size > 10 cm significantly increased the postoperative mortality risk in the Older group.
Only 50% of the Older patients received adjuvant chemotherapy compared to 70% in the Younger group
Mazzoni et al. 2007 Retrospective single center cohort study
1987–2002
Liver resection
Including: wedge resection, segmentectomy, right and left lobectomy
197
Older (≥70 yo) = 53
Younger (<70 yo) = 144
Mean lesion size 2.8 cm in both groups.
LM were multiple in 103 cases and limited to one lobe in 151 patients. All patients but 84 were treated for hepatic metachronous metastases.
Not reported Older: 20.7%
Younger: 14.6%
(p = 0.18)
Older: 5.7%
Younger: 2.1%
(p = 0.19)
Older: 83%
Younger: 86.8%
(NSD)
Median OS
Older : 28 months
Younger: 31 months
(p = 0.30)
Not reported • The number of Clinical Risk Score parameters and the microscopical involvement of the hepatic resectional margin were found to directly affect survival
Age by itself may not be a contraindication to surgery.
Mann et al. 2008 Retrospective cohort study
1999–2005
Liver resection
Including anatomical resections, extended procedures and extra-anatomical resections performed with curative intent
191
Older (≥70 yo) = 49
Younger (<70 yo) = 142
Not reported Not reported Older: 30.6%
Younger: 19%
At 30 days :
Older: 0%
Younger: 2%
At 60 days:
Older: 4%
Younger: 3%
(NSD)
Not reported 1-, 3-, 5-year OS:
Older: 89%, 38%, 31%
Younger: . 88%, 54%, 43%
(NSD)
1-, 3-, 5-year DFS:
Older: 76%, 35%, 29%,
Younger: 62%, 38%, 32%,
Aggressive surgical policy towards CRLM in Older patients is associated with low peri-operative morbidity and mortality, as well as good long-term outcomes, thus justifying its use.
Adam et al. 2010 Retrospective multicenter cohort study
1986–2008
Liver resection
Including major and minor hepatectomies
7764
Older (≥70 yo) = 1624
Younger (<70 yo) = 6140
Synchronous CRLM: 661 Older vs. 2924 Younger
Metachronous CRLM: 913 Older vs. 2821 Younger
Maximum diameter > 50 mm: 372 Older vs. 1302 Younger
CRLM >3: 162 Older vs. 1206 Younger
Bilateral CRLM: 405 Older vs. 2224 Younger
Older: 33.9%
Younger: 33.2%
Older: 32.3%
Younger: 28.7%
(p<0.001)
After major hepatectomy:
Older: 37.8%
Younger : 35.2%
(p = 0.19)
At 60 days:
Older: 3.8%
Younger: 1.6%
(p<0.001)
After major hepatectomy:
Older: 5%
YOunger : 2.2%
(p<0.001)
Not reported 3-year OS:
Older: 57.1%
Younger: 60.2%
(p< 0.001)
3-year DFS:
Older: 37%
Younger: 31.9%
(p = 0.051)
Recurrence rate:
Older: 28.1%
Younger: 35.6%
(p>0.001)
Within the Older group, preoperative CT was a risk factor for postoperative morbidity
Within the Older group: >3 CRLM at diagnosis (RR = 1.63 (95%CI: 1.13–2·36), bilateral CRLM (RR = 1.39 (1.04–1.87), and concomitant extrahepatic disease (RR = 1.56 (1.08–2.23) were predictors of mortality at 60 days
Di Benedetto et al. 2011 Retrospective matched cohort study
2002–2009
Liver resection
Associated surgery
(major operations performed during the liver resection) for 15.6% Older vs.
28.1% for Younger (p = 0.05)
64
Older (≥70 yo) = 32
Younger (<70 yo) = 32
Synchronous CRLM:
22 Older vs. 23 Younger
Administered for unresectable liver metastases
Older: 62.5% Younger: 81.3%
Oder: 28.1%
Younger:
34.4%
(p>0.99)
At 30 days:
0% in both groups
At 60 days:
Older: 3%
Younger: 0%
(NSD)
75% in both groups 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS:
Older:
84.1%, 51.9%, 33.3%
Younger: 93.6%, 63%, 28%,
(p = 0.50)
1-, 3-, and 5-year DFS:
Older: 67.9%, 29.2%, 19.5%
Younger: 57.6%, 32.9%, 16.4%,
(p = 0.72)
Not reported
Cannon et al. 2011 Retrospective case-control study
Not reported
Liver resection
Including synchronous resection of colon and liver; major hepatectomy (52% Older vs. 53% Younger; p = 0.9). Laparoscopy in 12.5% of Older vs. 19.8% of Younger (p = 0.3)
279
Older (≥70 yo) = 59
Younger (<70 yo) = 220
Number of CRLM: 2.02 for Older vs. 2.61 for Yonger (p = 0.4)
Mean size: 4.39 cm for Older vs. 4.61 cm for Younger (p = 0.1)
Overall 58% of patients
(NSD between the groups)
Older: 52.5%
Younger: 48.2%
(p = 0.5)
At 90 days:
Older: 0%
Younger:. 4.1%
(p = 0.2)
Older: 81.4%
Younger: 88.6%
(p = 0.14)
1-, 3-, 5-year OS:
Older: 91.2%, 47.6%, 20.9%
Younger: 92.3%, 59.6%, 35.1%
(p = 0.07)
1-, 3-, 5-year DFS:
Older: 78.3%, 22.3%, 16.7% for
Younger : 74.4%, 37.9%, 18.9%
(p = 0.15)
Need of transfusion was independent predictors of postoperative morbidity (OR for non transfused patients = 0.45 [95%CI: 0.25–0.79])
Age was not associated with shortened OS and DFS.
Fong score and BMI <20 were independent predictors of OS
Fong score was predictor of DFS
Kulik et al. 2011 Retrospective cohort study
1994–2008
Liver resection
Including 51.8% minor and 48.2% major resections
939
Older (≥70 yo) = 190
Younger (40–69 y.o.) = 719
Young (<40) = 29
Synchronous CRLM: 334 patients
Unilobar CRLM: 654 patients
One CRLM: 491 patients
Mean size: 56.78 mm (range: 3–315 mm; SD: 39.0)
Overall: 53.2% Older: 12.4%
Younger.. 15.3%
(p = 0.24)
Older: 0.54%
Younger: 1.26%
(NSD)
Older: 96.7%
Younger: 96.6%
(p = 0.663)
5-year OS:
Older: 31.2%
Younger: 37.5%
Young: 21.6%
Not reported • For the whole sample, metastases diameter >50 mm, rising number of transfusions (>6) needed during surgery, duration of surgical procedure >210 min, and age ≥70 years were predictors of poorer OS.
• For Older patients, the rising number of transfusions (>6) needed during surgery was an independent predictor of OS (HR: 3.64 (95%CI: 1.31–10.11)
Cook et al. 2012 Retrospective cohort study
1989–2009
Liver resection
All elective open hepatic resections
1279
Older (≥75 yo) = 151
Younger (<75 yo) = 1292
Synchronous metastases: 37.1% for Older vs. 39.6% for Younger
Unilateral CRLM: 76.2% for Older vs. 72.4% for Younger
≥ liver metastases: 54.3% for Older vs. 69.8% for Younger
Older: 43%
Younger: 55.7%
(p = 0.003)
Older : 32.5%
Younger : 21.2%
(p = 0.02)
Older: 7.3%
Younger: 1.3%
(p = 0.001)
Not reported Median OS:
Older : 44.1 (range 38.4–56.8) months
Younger : 43.6 (range 40.2–47.0) months
(p = 0.697)
Not reported Not reported
Kumar et al. 2013 Population-based retrospective cohort study
2006–2012
Multi treatments
Surgery (1211), hepatic metastatectomy (292), lung metastatectomy (56), CT (1291). Liver-only metastases were reported in 35.7% Older vs. 39.7% Younger
2314
Older (≥80 yo) = 676
Younger (<80 y.o.) = 1638
Synchronous CRLM: 62.3% of Older vs. 65.3% of Younger
>2 sites of metastatic disease: 8% of Older vs. 9.2% of Younger (NSD)
CT: 28.1% of Older vs. 68.2% of Younger
Targeted therapies with monoclonal antibodies: 2.4% of Older and 16% of Younger
Not reported Not reported Not reported Older: 8.2 months
Younger: 19.2 months
(p<0.0001)
Not reported Older (≥80 yo) were less likely to receive intervention for their mCRC and had poorer survival.
• The survival of selected Older patients who received CT was similar to the survival of those younger despite the receipt of single-agent therapy.
Doat et al. 2014 Retrospective population-based national cohort study
April-December 2009
Multi treatments
Surgery of the primary tumour and metastases was significantly less frequent among Olders
31665
Older (≥75 yo) = 13255, of which metastatic CRC: 3588 (19.5%)
Younger (<75 yo) = 18410, of which metastatic CRC: 2724 (20.5%)
Metastatic site: most frequently the liver (68% in the Younger group vs. 72% in the Older group), followed by the peritoneum
(33%), lung (21%), bones (5%) and brain (1%)
Synchronous metastasis: 2724 patients in the Older vs. 3588 in Younger
Older: < 50% received palliative CT, Younger: 85%
Not reported Not reported Not reported OS of patients with metastatic CRC:
Older:
8.4 months (95%CI: 7.6–9.4)
Younger: 22.3 months (95%CI: 21–24.9)
Not reported Age <85 years, isolated metastasis, no bowel obstruction and Charlson Comorbidity Index ≤2, CT, liver surgery, and primary tumor resection were significant predictors of improved OS
Booth et al. 2015 Population-based retrospective cohort study
2002–2009
Liver resection
Including major (34%) and minor (64%) hepatectomies
1310
Older (≥75 yo) = 186
Younger (65–74 yo) = 414
Young (<65) = 710
Not reported Older: 14%
Younger: 15%
Young: 16%
Peri-operative CT was less common in Older patients: 41% of Older vs. 57% of Young er, vs. 71% of young patients (p<0.001).
Not reported At 30 days:
Older: 5%
Younger: 3%
Young: 1%
(p = 0.005)
At 90 days:
Older: 8%
Younger: 5%
Young: 2% (p<0.001)
Not reported 5-year OS:
Older:
28%
Younger: 44%
Young: 49% (p<0.001).
10-year OS:
Older: 12%
Younger: 23%
Young: 35% (p<0.001)
Not reported Increasing age and major hepatectomy were independent predictors of mortality at 30 days
• Resection of CRLM is associated with greater risk of postoperative mortality among Older patients despite less aggressive treatment.
Nomi et al. 2015 Retrospective single center matched case control study
1998–2013
Liver resection
All resections were performed with curative intent
93
Older (≥70 yo) = 31
Younger (<70 yo) = 62
CRLM size ≥ 5 cm: 32.3% of Older vs. 29% of Younger
Median number of lesions: 2 (range: 1–8) for Older vs. 2 (1–6) for Younger
(NSD)
Older: 58.1%
Younger: 75.8%
(p = 0.09)
Older: 41.9%
Younger: 54.8% (p = 0.276)
At 90 days: 0% for both groups Older: 83.9%
Younger: . 95.2%
(p = 0.116)
3-year OS: Older: 57.9%
Younger: 61.7%
(p = 0.842)
3-year DFS:
Older: 38.5%
Younger: 35.3%
(p = 0.676)
• Laparoscopic major hepatectomy for CRLM could be safely performed in Older patients
Advanced age itself should not be regarded as contraindication for liver surgery
Parakh et al. 2015 Population-based retrospective cohort study
2009–2014
Multi treatments:
Surgical resection of metastatic disease occurred in 21% of patients, declining with advancing
age (26% in Younger vs. 21% in Older vs. 6% in very old, p<0.001)
821
Very old (≥85 yo) = 106
Older (75–84 yo) = 352
Younger (65–74) = 363
Metastatic site: liver (62%), lung (32%), bone (3%), brain (1.5%)
Synchronous metastatic disease: 58% patients
No age-related differences
Overall 23% of patients, with differences between age groups (only 34% of very old received neoadjuvant CT)
Not reported Not reported Not reported Median OS:
Very old: 11 months
Older: 20 months
Younger: 26 months (p<0.001)
Not reported • Longer median survival was observed for patients who received CT across each of the age groups, though not reaching statistical significance in those ≥85 years (p = 0.061)
• >Older patients (aged 75–84) (HR: 1.33, 95%CI: 1.09–1.63) and very old (aged ≥ 85 years) (HR: 2.39, 95%CI: 1.80–3.16) had a poorer OS than Younger patients (aged 65–74 years)
Nachmany et al. 2016 Retrospective cohort study
2010–2015
Liver resection
25% by laparoscopy (22.5% in the Older vs. 27.7% in the Younger, p = 0.49). Major liver resection: 20.3% in Older vs. 34.1% in Younger (NSD)
174
Older (≥70 yo) = 54
Younger (<70 y.o.) = 120
Number of metastasis: 1.7 (SD: 1.38) for Older vs. 2.96 (SD: 2.86) for Younger (p = 0.003)
Maximal lesion size: 37 mm (SD: 25.9) for Older vs. 32.9 mm (SD: 26.3) for Younger (p = 0.18)
Bilobar disease: 16.6% for Older vs. 33.3% for Younger (p = 0.07)
Older: 55.5% Younger: 76.6% (p = 0.13) Older : 11.1% Younger: 2.5% r (p<0.0001) At 60 days:
Older: 1.8%
Older: 90%
Younger: 86% (p = 0.14)
3-year OS: NSD
3-year OS: NSD Not reported
Nardo et al. 2016 Retrospective multicenter cohort study
2008–2015
Liver resection
149
Very old (≥75 yo) = 21
Older (65–74 yo) = 79
Younger (<65) = 49
Unilobar liver metastases: 16.7% in the very old group vs. 21.1% in the
Older vs. 28.6% in the Younger Mean lesion size: 4.6 cm for very old vs. 4.5 cm for Older vs. 4.1 cm for Younger (NSD)
Very old: 14.3%
Older: 16.5%
Younger: 16.3% (p = 0.97)
Very old: 24.1%
Older:. 24%
Younger: 22.4%
(p = 0.86)
At 30 days:
Very old: 4.8%
Older: 2.5% Younger: 0% (p = 0.8)
At 60 days: Very Old: 4.8%
Older:
3.8% Younger: . 2% (p = 0.8)
Very old: 90.5%
Older: 90.1%
Younger: 93.9% (p = 0.83)
1-, 3- and 5-year OS:
Very old: 85.7%, 38.9%, 28.6%
Older: 89.9%, 38%, 33.3%
Younger: 87.6%, 53.5%, 43.5% (NSD)
1-, 3- and 5-year DFS:
Very old: 76.2%, 31.3%, 20% Older: 75.9%, 35%, 28.6% Younger: 77.1%, 37.6%, 36.4% (NSD)
Advanced chronological age cannot be considered a medical or surgical contraindication to hepatic resection for CRLM
Gandy et al. 2018 Retrospective cohort study
2007–2014
Liver resection
The majority of patients in both groups (64% and 62%) underwent major liver resections (>3 segments)
187
Older (≥75 yo) = 29
Younger (<75 y.o.) = 158
Not reported Older: 52%
Younger: 69% (p = 0.71)
Older: 13.8%
Younger: 16.5% (p = 0.65)
1 patients per group (NSD)
Not reported 1-, 3-, 5-year OS:
Older: 92.3%, 67.3%, 57.7%
Younger: 95.1%, 72.9%, 55.6% (p = 0.6)
Not reported Not reported
Yue et al. 2018 Retrospective single center cohort study
2009–2016
Liver resection
All laparoscopic hepatectomiesincluding left lateral sectionectomy, sectionectomy, wedge resections
241
Older (≥70 yo) = 78
Younger 60–69 y.o.) = 163
Largest lesion size: 2 cm (1–4) for Older vs. 3 cm (1–5) for Younger (p = 0.128)
Number of lesions: 2 (1–3) for Older vs. 2 (1–4) for Younger (p = 0.20)
Older: 88.4%
Younger: 72.3%
(p = 0.005)
At 90 days:
Older: 26.9%
Younger: 23.3%
(p = 0.5)
At 90 days: 1 patient per group (overall: 0.8%)
100% for both groups 5-year OS:
Older: 52%
Younger: 59%, (p = 0.139)
5-year DFS: Older: 45% Younger: 49% (p = 0.09)
TNM stage, disease-free interval, and number of metastases were independent predictors of OS
Disease-free interval and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels were independent predictors of DFS
Age did not independently predict OS or DFS
Zarzavadjian Le Bian et al. 2019 Retrospective cohort study
2008–2017
Liver resection
All laparoscopic procedures
Local radiotherapy was performed in 34% of rectal cancers
335
Very old (>75 yo) = 52
Older (65–75 yo) = 136
Younger (55–65 yo) = 113
Young (< 55 yo) = 34
Synchronous liver metastases: 154 patients
Bilobar metastasis: 107 patients
More than 5 CRLM: 19 patient
Overall, 47.5% of patients Very old: 9.6%
Older: . 7.4%
Younger: 12.4%
Young: 17.6% (p = 0.287)
At 90 days: 0%
Not reported Not reported Not reported Not reported

NSD stands for non significantly different.