. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Jun 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Res Pers. 2020 Mar 10;86:103942. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103942

Table 2:

Main Effects of Negative Affect Predicting EMA Impulsivity

	Acting on Impulse			Planning			Persistence

Between-person^a	β	B	95% CI	β	b	95% CI	β	b	95% CI
Intercept		12.95	3.29 – 10.33		42.06	35.08 – 49.03		47.93	40.62 – 55.23
Sex^b	.087	1.74	−0.71 – 4.2	.002	.04	−3.28 – 3.37	−.017	−0.45	−3.93 – 3.03
Age^b	−.033	−0.65	−2.21 – .09	−.025	−.62	−2.73 – 1.49	.026	0.67	−1.54 – 2.87
Sample^b	−.44	−8.85	−14.41– −3.29	.93	23.16	15.61–30.71	.79	20.35	12.44–28.25
Non-White^b	.15	3.01	0.63 – 5.38	−.039	−0.98	−4.21 – 2.25	−.18	−4.62	−8.00 – −1.24
Average Negative Affect	.28	0.46	0.34 – 0.57	−.024	−0.05	−0.2 – 0.11	−.099	−0.21	−0.38 – −0.05
Negative Urgency	.17	5.96	3.6 – 8.41	−.11	−4.83	−7.95 – −1.72	−.062	−2.83	−6.10 – 0.43

Within-person^a
Time of Day^b	.009	0.14	0.02 – 0.25	.003	0.07	−0.10 – 0.23	.011	0.21	0.04 – 0.37
Weekend^b	.042	0.57	−0.33 – 1.48	−.048	−0.82	−2.05 – 0.41	−.016	−0.18	−1.45 – 1.08
Observation #^b	.001	0.03	−0.02 – 0.08	.001	0.01	−0.06 – 0.08	−.003	−0.05	−0.12 – 0.02
EMA Negative Affect	.16	0.20	0.15 – 0.24	−.013	−0.01	−0.07 – 0.04	−.049	−0.07	−0.13 – −0.02

Cross-level^c
Neg. Urgency × EMA Neg. Affect		0.06	−0.01 – 0.13		−0.07	−0.16 – 0.03		−0.01	−0.11 – 0.09

Note: effects with a p-value <.05 are presented in bold.

Between-person standardized coefficients were calculated using only between-person variance in impulsivity outcomes, whereas within-person coefficients were calculated using only within-person variance.

Standardized coefficients for these covariates were calculated using unstandardized predictors and standardized outcomes because these predictors are not meaningful when standardized.

Standardized coefficients for interaction terms were not reported as they are not more meaningful when standardized.