Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 30;26(2):180–203. doi: 10.5056/jnm20014

Table 6.

Summary of the Evidence Supporting Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy in Patients With Type III Achalasia

Study Country Study design Participants Intervention Comparator Follow-up duration Outcome
2015, Kumbhari et al92 International (4 USA, 3 Asian, and 1 European centers) Retrospective cohort study Type 3 achalasia patients who underwent POEM or LHM POEM, n = 49 LHM, n = 26 POEM, mean 8.6 mo; LHM, mean 21.5 mo Median procedure time, min: POEM, 102 (43-345); LHM, 264 (189-331)Clinical response rate: POEM, 98.0% (n = 48); LHM, 80.8% (n = 21)
2017, Khan et al95 USA Meta-analysis Eight studies on type 3 achalasia patients who underwent POEM POEM, n = 179 None Range, 3 mo-3 yr Clinical success rate (8 studies): 91.6% (95% CI, 84.3-95.7%)Adverse event rate (8 studies): 11.2% (95% CI, 6.3-19.0%)

POEM, peroral endoscopic myotomy; LHM, laparoscopic Heller myotomy; CI, confidence interval.