Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Allergy. 2019 Dec 2;75(4):911–920. doi: 10.1111/all.14106

Table II.

Proportion of study participants meeting various CRS symptom and radiologic opacification definitions in study sample (unweighted) and as estimated prevalence in source population (native weights)

Characteristic Study Sample (n = 646) Unweighted Percent (SE) Source Population Weighted Percent (SE)
CRSS status
 Current (n = 324) 50.2 (2.0) 16.1 (1.9)
 Past (n = 249) 38.5 (1.9) 24.5 (1.8)
 Never (n = 73) 11.3 (1.2) 59.5 (2.0)
CRSO status§
 Lund-Mackay 3 (n = 168) 26.0 (1.7) 12.4 (2.3)
 Lund-Mackay 4 (n = 137) 21.2 (1.6) 11.2 (2.3)
 Lund-Mackay 6 (n = 89) 13.8 (1.4) 6.6 (1.9)
CRSS-O status
 Lund-Mackay 3 (n = 89) 13.8 (1.4) 3.6 (0.80)
 Lund-Mackay 4 (n = 73) 11.3 (1.2) 3.2 (0.79)
 Lund-Mackay 6 (n = 41) 6.3 (0.96) 1.3 (0.67)
Frontal sinus opacification¥ 13.0 (1.3) 8.3 (2.5)
Maxillary sinus opacification¥ 42.6 (1.9) 28.6 (7.1)
Anterior ethmoid opacitication¥ 28.8 (1.8) 21.7 (7.1)
Posterior ethmoid opacification¥ 19.4 (1.6) 14.7 (6.7)
Sphenoid opacification¥ 9.9 (1.2) 5.1 (1.7)
Ostiomeatal complex opacification¥ 12.9 (1.3) 8.1 (2.2)
Nasal cavity opacification¥ 5.3 (0.88) 1.6 (0.48)

Weighted for sampling and participation rates to estimate prevalence in source population.

Never: did not report European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis (EPOS) CRS symptoms in lifetime; past: met EPOS CRS symptoms in lifetime but not currently; current: met EPOS CRS symptoms in the last 3 months.

§

Lund-Mackay score based on CT scoring by two otolaryngologists blinded to CRSS status.

Met criteria for current CRSS and CRSO criteria at different Lund-Mackay cut-points.

¥

Any opacification/occlusion score >0.