. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: J Nucl Cardiol. 2019 Oct 23;27(4):1104–1113. doi: 10.1007/s12350-019-01911-9

Table 6.

Summary of the correlation between the technologists and the unadjusted automated motion correction

		CNMT1 (auto) vs unadjusted automated motion correction	CNMT2 (auto) vs unadjusted automated motion correction
Global MBF	r	0.999	0.998
(N=200)	LOA	−0.10 0.08	−0.12 0.13
Global MFR	r	0.993	0.994
(N=100)	LOA	−0.15 0.18	−0.12 0.18
Vascular MBF	r	0.997	0.996
(N=600)	LOA	−0.15 0.13	−0.17 0.18
Vascular MFR	r	0.986	0.988
(N=300)	LOA	−0.22 0.23	−0.19 0.24

The limits of agreement (LOA) for MBF are in mL/min/g