Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 6;29(5):418–429. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-009330

Table 2.

Multilevel negative binomial regression results

Adjusted results*
IRR (95% CI) P value
CLABSI rate
 Preintervention slope 0.95 (0.77 to 1.19) 0.67
 Shift in rates preintervention to intervention 0.90 (0.72 to 1.11) 0.32
 Intervention slope 0.71 (0.53 to 0.96) 0.03
 Intervention slope change 0.75 (0.52 to 1.08) 0.13
Central line utilisation rate
 Preintervention slope 0.97 (0.94 to 0.99) 0.004
 Shift in rates preintervention to intervention 1.01 (0.99 to 1.03) 0.51
 Intervention slope 0.94 (0.91 to 0.96) <0.001
 Intervention slope change 0.97 (0.93 to 1.00) 0.09
CAUTI rate
 Preintervention slope 0.96 (0.80 to 1.15) 0.66
 Shift in rates preintervention to intervention 0.94 (0.79 to 1.12) 0.48
 Intervention slope 0.76 (0.60 to 0.96) 0.02
 Intervention slope change 0.79 (0.59 to 1.06) 0.12
Urinary catheter utilisation rate
 Preintervention slope 0.95 (0.93 to 0.97) <0.001
 Shift in rates preintervention to intervention 1.00 (0.99 to 1.02) 0.73
 Intervention slope 0.93 (0.91 to 0.95) <0.001
 Intervention slope change 0.98 (0.95 to 1.01) 0.14

*All models were adjusted for teaching status, urban or rural hospital location, type of hospital ownership, ICU bed size, ICU type, and whether or not the ICU focused its programme implementation efforts on the relevant infection (CLABSI, CAUTI or both).

CAUTI, catheter-associated urinary tract infection; CLABSI, central line-associated bloodstream infection; ICU, intensive care unit; IRR, incidence rate ratio.