Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Microbiol. 2020 Feb 5;113(4):841–858. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14449

Table 4.

Comparison of subsets of CodY-binding regions with different strengths

Enrichment (fold) Number of:
CodY-binding regions CodY-binding sites upstream sites overlapping CodY-binding motifs ChIP-Seq regionsa RNA-Seq regulated genesa
Analysis I
>10 388 518 98 (19%) 202 (39%) 46 (12%) 84 (22%)
>15 224 313 72 (23%) 132 (42%) 41 (18%) 49 (22%)
>20 146 203 54 (27%) 94 (46%) 37 (25%) 34 (23%)
>30 78 107 40 (37%) 56 (52%) 27 (35%) 20 (25%)
>40 58 81 32 (40%) 47 (58%) 26 (45%) 14 (24%)
>60 31 46 17 (37%) 30 (65%) 19 (61%) 9 (29%)
>100 17 26 9 (35%) 13 (50%) 14 (82%) 5 (29%)
Analysis II
10–15 164 205 26 (13%) 70 (34%) 6 (3%) 35 (21%)
15–20 78 110 18 (16%) 38 (35%) 4 (5%) 15 (19%)
20–30 68 96 14 (15%) 38 (40%) 10 (15%) 14 (21%)
30–60 47 61 23 (38%) 26 (43%) 8 (17%) 11 (23%)
>60 31 46 17 (37%) 30 (65%) 19 (61%) 9 (29%)
ChIP-Seqb 58 59 7 (12%) 25 (42%) 58 (100%) 13 (22%)

Various subsets of 388 CodY-binding regions and associated 518 CodY-binding sites identified by IDAP-Seq were analyzed and compared to the CodY-binding regions and sites identified by ChIP-Seq.

a

Data taken from our analysis of the previously obtained results (Lobel and Herskovits, 2016)

b

All regions with CodY-binding sites identified by ChIP-Seq in cells grown in BHI (Lobel and Herskovits, 2016)