Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;10:6798. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63545-z

Table 2.

Cell-by-cell Pearson’s correlation between pairs of maps.

Scaling Water resistance High contrast Low contrast
High Low High Low
H index HF HU HF HU HF HU HF HU
High contrast High HF 1.00 0.79 0.73 0.58 0.83 0.85 0.64 0.67
HU 0.79 1.00 0.41 0.54 0.56 0.65 0.34 0.43
Low HF 0.73 0.41 1.00 0.78 0.78 0.77 0.91 0.91
HU 0.58 0.54 0.78 1.00 0.57 0.64 0.66 0.75
Low contrast High HF 0.83 0.56 0.78 0.57 1.00 0.94 0.85 0.82
HU 0.85 0.65 0.77 0.64 0.94 1.00 0.78 0.85
Low HF 0.64 0.34 0.91 0.66 0.85 0.78 1.00 0.94
HU 0.67 0.43 0.91 0.75 0.82 0.85 0.94 1.00

The eight maps represent all eight combinations of three factors: scaling function (high or low contrast), water resistance (high or low), and H index (HF and HU). Boxes delineate comparisons using the same scaling function. Bold values denote comparisons between maps that only differ in their H index; italic values are comparisons between maps that only differ in their degree of water resistance. (Note: full symmetric matrix is provided for ease of reference).