TABLE 4.
Structural equation modeling comparison.
| Model | χ2 | df | χ2/df | RMSEA | CFI | TLI | Δχ2 | Δdf |
| M0 | 731.80 | 395 | 1.85 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.93 | ||
| M1 | 731.64 | 394 | 1.86 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 0.16 | 1 |
| M2 | 731.69 | 394 | 1.86 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.11 | 1 |
| M3 | 716.80 | 394 | 1.82 | 0.06 | 0.93 | 0.93 | 15.00*** | 1 |
***p < 0.001. M1 adds a direct path from career success criteria clarity (CSCC) to career satisfaction based on M0; M2 adds a direct path from CSCC to person–job fit based on M0; M3 adds a direct path from CSCC to well-being based on M0. CFI, Comparative Fit Index; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; TLI, Tucker–Lewis Index.