Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 20;6(4):e03785. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03785

Table 3.

Quantitative comparison (mean ± SD) of viability and morphology of sperm. Samples were taken from 10 animals in each group. Data was analyzed using one0way ANOVA followed by tukey's post test. ∗∗∗P < 0.001compared with control group and ##P < 0.01 and ###P < 0.001 compared with CP-received group.

Parameter
Groups
Viable sperm Sperm morphology
Head abnormalities Midpiece defects Faulty tail
1-Control 61 ± 1.09 1.1 ± 0.23 2.5 ± 0.45 2 ± 0.36
2- CP 36.2 ± 1.44∗∗∗ 5.5 ± 0.42∗∗∗ 6.2 ± 0.64∗∗∗ 7.4 ± 0.63∗∗∗
3- OLE 63.7 ± 3.14 0.8 ± 0.2## 1.7 ± 0.36 1.6 ± 0.3
4- oleuropein 62.1 ± 1.2 0.9 ± 0.17 2.1 ± 0.27 1.8 ± 0.35
5- CP + OLE 40.7 ± 1.53 3.7 ± 0.49 4.9 ± 0.45 5.2 ± 0.51
6- CP + oleuropein 38.4 ± 0.73 4.7 ± 0.33 5.7 ± 0.47 6.7 ± 0.9
7- OLE + oleuropein 64.5 ± 1.24 0.4 ± 0.16 1.2 ± 0.29 1.1 ± 0.27
8- CP + OLE + oleuropein 48.5 ± 1.33##, ∗∗ 3 ± 0.25### 3.8 ± 0.48## 4.4 ± 0.54