. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 23.

Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2019 Jan;96:10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.12.009. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.12.009

Table 3.

Models predicting the effect of integration on child maltreatment outcomes.

Predictors	Substantiated Case Rate		Substantiated Victim Rate (All Types of CM)		Substantiated Victim Rate (Neglect)		Referral Rate		Hospitalizations Due to Child Maltreatment
Predictors	β	p-value	β	p-value	β	p-value	β	p-value	β	p-value
Unemployment	−0.04	0.61	0.01	0.95	0.04	0.76	0.38	0.42	0.062	0.98
TANF-CW Integration (1-year lag)	0.68	0.01	1.36	0.00	0.91	0.05	2.71	0.17	4.54	0.46
TANF-CW Integration (2-year lag)	0.19	0.44	0.25	0.57	0.29	0.51	−0.98	0.48	−7.13	0.49

Note. Standard errors adjusted for unequal variance across counties and assuming a common variance within each county.