Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;7(2):027501. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.7.2.027501

Table 3.

Overall mean scores for each display for both the general and selected evaluation. The general evaluation involved a single haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained slide. The monitors have been ranked according to preference within the general evaluation. The selected evaluation involved two H&E stained slides, one human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 haematoxylin-diaminobenzidine stained slide of control breast tissue, and one papanicolaou stained slide.

Monitor General evaluation (n = 34) Selected evaluation (n = 4)
All pathologists (n = 34) Consultants (n = 21) Trainees (n = 13) H&E H-DAB PAP
D 81 82 80 95 82 89
A 68 69 74 82 78 71
C 66 62 72 57 51 53
E 64 61 67 79 70 69
F 55 55 52 62 62 60
H 47 44 47 38 61 56
B 45 39 56 21 25 23
G 41 38 43 34 36 18