DNA was extracted from 15 to 10 mosquito pools. To assess the sensitivity of both techniques, the mosquito pools consisted of a mix of WT and NHEJ mosquitoes at 11 different ratios of WT:NHEJ (10:0, 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8, 1:9 and 0:10). DNA was used for PCR, and amplicons were subjected to IDAA and ddPCR analysis to determine the indel percentage in each sample. Each ratio was conducted in triplicate (n = 3), and average results were compared between the two techniques. Although deviating from theoretical indel percentages (40% indel for a 6:4 ratio), both techniques demonstrated precision based on producing similar results for each ratio and having a Pearson correlation coefficient of r = 0.99. In addition, values provided by ddPCR and IDAA are also representative of their accuracy; because both deduced the same indel percentage, it is likely close to the actual indel percentage. Student's t test was performed to compare the measurements at each ratio (*p < 0.05).
ddPCR: Droplet Digital PCR; IDAA: Indel detection by amplicon analysis; Indel: Insertions or deletion; NHEJ: Nonhomologous end joining; WT: Wild-type.