Sharples 2004.
Clinical features and settings |
Clinical features
Setting
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Study design | Cross sectional study | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Coronary artery stenosis measured by coronary angiography
|
|
Index and comparator tests |
EBCT
|
|
Follow‐up | None reported. | |
Notes | Results reported per vessel, not per patient. Insufficient data to construct meaningful 2 x 2 table. Therefore, study did not contribute data to the meta‐analysis. | |
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | ESKD patients assessed for CAD before kidney transplant. |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Coronary angiography with a reference standard threshold of ≥ 75% stenosis. |
Acceptable delay between tests? All tests | Unclear | Likely to be short delay between tests. |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All participants who underwent the index test received the reference standard test. |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | Yes | Disease status (CAD) diagnosed by coronary angiography. |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | Disease status (CAD) diagnosed by coronary angiography. |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | Yes | Analysis of the coronary angiograms was performed using a digital analysis system operated by a cardiologist blinded to the calcification score. |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | The acquired images were scored with the use of Imatron software by a single radiologist blinded to the clinical or angiographic history of the patient. |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Relevant clinical information was provided regarding the performance and analysis of both the index and reference tests. |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | Yes | There were no uninterpretable results. |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | Yes | There were no withdrawals. |