Vandenberg 1996.
Clinical features and settings |
Clinical features
Setting
|
|
Participants |
|
|
Study design | Cohort study | |
Target condition and reference standard(s) |
Coronary artery stenosis measured by coronary angiography
|
|
Index and comparator tests |
Pharmacologic stress thallium scintigraphy
Exercise radionuclide ventriculography
|
|
Follow‐up | The mean time from thallium scintigraphy to the latest follow‐up visit was 35 ± 19 months. | |
Notes | ||
Table of Methodological Quality | ||
Item | Authors' judgement | Description |
Representative spectrum? All tests | Yes | Renal failure patients undergoing cardiac evaluation as part of transplant workup. |
Acceptable reference standard? All tests | Yes | Yes, coronary angiography with a reference standard threshold of ≥75% stenosis. |
Acceptable delay between tests? All tests | Yes | Angiography was performed 55 ± 42 days after thallium scintigraphy in 42 patients and 50 ± 45 days after exercise radionuclide ventriculography in 40 patients. |
Partial verification avoided? All tests | Yes | All participants who received an index test received the reference standard test. |
Differential verification avoided? All tests | Yes | This was not an issue in this study. Disease status (CAD) is diagnosed only through coronary angiography. |
Incorporation avoided? All tests | Yes | This was not an issue in this study. Disease status (CAD) is diagnosed only through coronary angiography. |
Reference standard results blinded? All tests | Yes | Measurements were made by a single observer without knowledge of the results of the imaging tests. |
Index test results blinded? All tests | Yes | Images were interpreted by the consensus of two experienced radiologists who were unaware of the angiography results. |
Relevant clinical information? All tests | Yes | Relevant clinical information was provided regarding the performance and analysis of both the index and reference tests. |
Uninterpretable results reported? All tests | Yes | Yes. One MPS was technically suboptimal and was therefore not included in the analysis. Exercise ventriculography was suboptimal in five patients and they were not included in the analysis. |
Withdrawals explained? All tests | Yes | All patients missing from the final analysis were accounted for. |