Skip to main content
. 2015 May 2;2015(5):CD008138. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008138.pub3

Comparison 6. Ketoconazole vs climbazole.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Failure to achieve complete resolution (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Scalp only 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2 Erythema ‐ Failure to achieve complete resolution 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 Scalp only 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Erythema ‐ Failure to achieve complete resolution (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 Scalp only 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
4 Scaling ‐ Erythema ‐ Failure to achieve complete resolution 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
4.1 Scalp only 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
5 Scaling ‐ Erythema ‐ Failure to achieve complete resolution (long term) 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
5.1 Scalp only 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]