Skip to main content
. 2015 May 2;2015(5):CD008138. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008138.pub3

Comparison 26. Ketoconazole vs steroids ‐ Subgroup analysis by dose.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Failure to achieve complete resolution 6 302 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.95, 1.44]
1.1 28% per week 2 81 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.27 [0.65, 2.50]
1.2 14% per week 2 103 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.49, 2.30]
1.3 2% to 7% per week 2 118 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.97, 1.42]
2 Failure to achieve complete resolution (long term) 2   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 28% per week 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 2% to 7% per week 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Erythema ‐ Failure to achieve complete resolution 2 195 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.19, 1.38]
3.1 2% to 7% per week 2 195 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.51 [0.19, 1.38]
4 Decrease in scaling score 5 329 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.19 [‐0.13, 0.51]
4.1 14% per week 2 110 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.02 [‐0.52, 0.48]
4.2 2% to 7% per week 3 219 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [‐0.12, 0.77]