Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 5;17(7):2489. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072489

Table 3.

Analysis of studies on caffeine intake perception, according to the PICOS 1 method.

Study Participants Interventions Comparisons Outcomes S. Design
Bucher and Siegrist (2015) [23] 100 children with one parent (n = 100 couples); ages 7–10 Beverage-sorting task Product classification in healthy and unhealthy Negative perception of caffeine Cross- sectional
Wierzejska et al. (2016) [24] 329 children: ages 11–13 Food frequency questionnaire Personal interviews Negative perception of caffeine Face-to-face interview
Visram et al. (2017) [25] 37 children, 2 groups: ages 10–11 (n = 20) and ages 13–14 (n = 17) Semi-structured focus groups Personal opinions Negative perception of caffeine Qualitative, based on data

1 PICOS = P: participants; I: interventions; C: comparisons; O: outcomes; S: study design.