Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;17(7):2606. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072606

Table 1.

Summary of consultation qualitative feedback.

Theme Feedback Further Changes Made
Programme intensity
  • Reducing content made the programme more accessible

  • Programme looked easier to do alongside job role

  • There was too much to do in the previous version

Some activity repetitions were reduced further
Additions to the programme
  • New activity added would work well

  • New activity met resident’s needs

  • New module would be helpful for some but not all residents

  • Supervision would be helpful

Kept new module but made it optional
Agreed that supervision would be offered weekly
Individual resident factors as barriers
  • Resident personality and dementia severity, would influence programme feasibility and usefulness

  • Programme dependent on resident’s verbal ability

Inclusion criteria to not include individuals with severe dementia as measured by the Functional Assessment Staging Test
To meet this criteria, resident participants had to be able to speak more than 5–7 words a day