Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 5;21(7):2532. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072532

Table 1.

Comparison of pivotal phase III clinical trials with available results evaluating immune checkpoints inhibitors.

Study Name Tested Drugs Comparison Phase Histology Therapy Setting OS
(HR, 95% CI, p)
Median PFS
(HR, 95% CI)
ORR
(%)
CR
(%)
Grade 3
(%)
Javelin Renal 101 avelumab + axitinib sunitinib III ccRCC First line 12-mo: 86% vs. 83%
(0.78; 0.55–1.08; p  =  0.14)
13.8 vs. 7.2 mo
(0.61)
55.2 vs. 25,5 3.4 vs. 1.8 71.2 vs. 71.5
Keynote 426 pembrolizumab + axitinib sunitinib III ccRCC First line 12-mo: 90% vs. 78%
(0.53; 0.38–0.74; p  <  0.0001)
15.1 vs. 11.1 mo
(0.69; 0.57–0.84)
59.3 vs. 35.7 5.8 vs. 1.9 75.8 vs. 70.6
CheckMate 214 nivolumab + ipilimumab sunitinib III ccRCC First line 30-mo : 60% vs, 47%
(0.66; 0.54–0.80; p  <  0.0001)
11.6 vs. 8.4 mo
(0.82; 0.64–1,05)
42 vs. 29 9 vs. 1 47 vs. 64
Immotion 151 atezolizumab + bevacizumab sunitinib III ccRCC First line 24 mo : 63% vs. 60%
(0.93; 0.76–1.14; p = 0·4751)
11.2 vs. 7.7 mo
(0.74; 0.57–0.96)
43 vs. 25 9 vs. 4 40 vs. 54

Abbreviations: OS = overall survival; HR = Hazard Ratio; PFS = progression-free survival; ORR = objective response rate; CR = complete response; ccRCC: clear cell renal cell carcinoma, mo = months.