Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 25;17(7):2182. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17072182

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics of the internal gap [µm] for the three evaluation methods (CV-SR, D-GOM and D-IOS), coping material (COM = resin composite, ZIR = zirconium dioxide and NPA = non-precious alloy) and measurement position (marginal, axial and occlusal fit).

Evaluation Method Coping Material Measurement Position Internal Gap [µm]
Mean Standard Deviation Median Confidence Interval
Lower Upper
CV-SR COM marginal fit 75.8 9.9 77.0 74.0 77.6
axial fit 96.4 9.3 96.0 94.7 98.1
occlusal fit 204.9 39.5 206.0 199.9 209.9
ZIR marginal fit 77.8 9.2 77.0 76.2 79.5
axial fit 100.2 9.3 100.5 98.5 101.8
occlusal fit 273.9 59.9 280.0 266.3 281.5
NPA marginal fit 79.8 12.6 79.0 77.5 82.1
axial fit 112.5 21.1 106.0 108.7 116.3
occlusal fit 451.1 147.6 463.0 432.4 469.9
D-GOM COM marginal fit 76.6 9.5 77.0 74.9 78.4
axial fit 98.0 10.8 96.5 96.0 100.0
occlusal fit 208.2 38.3 211.0 203.3 213.0
ZIR marginal fit 77.9 8.8 78.0 76.3 79.5
axial fit 101.6 9.6 101.0 99.9 103.4
occlusal fit 277.3 59.0 280.0 269.8 284.8
NPA marginal fit 80.1 11.7 80.5 78.0 82.2
axial fit 113.9 20.6 107.0 110.2 117.6
occlusal fit 455.2 146.9 470.5 436.6 473.9
D-IOS COM marginal fit 76.7 10.1 80.0 74.8 78.5
axial fit 99.1 10.8 100.0 97.1 101.0
occlusal fit 212.4 39.5 210.0 207.4 217.4
ZIR marginal fit 78.7 9.2 80.0 77.0 80.3
axial fit 103.8 10.2 100.0 101.9 105.6
occlusal fit 281.5 59.5 290.0 274.0 289.1
NPA marginal fit 80.4 12.3 80.0 78.2 82.6
axial fit 116.4 20.6 110.0 112.7 120.1
occlusal fit 458.7 147.2 470.0 440.0 477.4