Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 10;21(7):2631. doi: 10.3390/ijms21072631

Table 1.

Different IS and polarized secretory traffic in T lymphocyte IS and B lymphocyte IS.

CTL/APC Th/APC B/APC B/Th
Exosome secretion + [17] + [15] Unknown 1 + [16]
MTOC polarization + [45] + [95] + [90] + [94]
Secretory granules polarization Lytic granules, MVB [29] Lymphokine-containing granules, MVB [15,49] SL, MHC-II+ compartment [90] MHC-II+ compartment [94]
DAG/DGK-control of MTOC polarization + [69] + [15,69] Unknown Unknown
PKC/PKD control of secretory granules/MVB traffic + (PKCδ, PKCθ) 2 [34,73,96] + (PKCδ) [84] (PKD1/2) [59] + (PKCζ) [88,90] (PKD1/3) [59] Unknown
F-actin reorganization at IS + (CDC42/WASP/ARP2/3, Formins: FMNL1, Dia1) [31] + (CDC42/WASP/ARP2/3) (Formins: FMNL1, Dia1) [49,97] + (CDC42/WASP/ARP2/3) Ezrin, Moesin) [32] Unknown (TAGNL2?) [98]
F-actin reduction at cSMAC and MTOC polarization + [46] + (PKCδ dynein) [50,51,52,84] + (dynein, proteasome) [99,100] Unknown
F-actin reduction at MTOC and MTOC polarization Unknown Unknown + (Proteasome) [100,101] Unknown

1 Formal proof has not been obtained, although indirect evidence exists. 2 Brackets indicate the molecular components involved.