Table A1.
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative studies (COREQ): 32-item checklist.
| No. Item | Guide Questions/Description | Where in Manuscript |
|---|---|---|
| Domain 1: Research team and reflexivity | ||
| Personal Characteristics | ||
| 1. Interviewer/facilitator | Which author/s conducted the interview or focus group? | AD |
| 2. Credentials | What were the researcher’s credentials? e.g., PhD, MD | MDA: BSc, Msc, Grad Cert Diab Edu; UHM: MBBS, Msc, MD; AEOMA: BSc, Msc, PhD; AD: Bsc, PhD BSMA: BSc, Msc, Grad Cert ULT, Grad Cert Mgt, PhD |
| 3. Occupation | What was their occupation at the time of the study? | Please find at the end of this list |
| 4. Gender | Was the researcher male or female? | MDA: Female UHM: Male AEOMA: Male AD: Male BSMA: Female |
| 5. Experience and training | What experience or training did the researcher have? | All authors were experienced researchers in qualitative studies and have taken part and published peer reviewed articles in mHealth for diabetes management. |
| Relationship with participants | ||
| 6. Relationship established | Was a relationship established prior to study commencement? | Methods |
| 7. Participant knowledge of the interviewer | What did the participants know about the researcher? E.g., personal goals, reasons for doing the research | Methods |
| 8. Interviewer characteristics | What characteristics were reported about the interviewer/facilitator? E.g., Bias, assumptions, reasons and interests in the research topic | The motivation and background of the study were made clear to the participants before the start of the interview. Participants had no prior relationship with the interviewer. |
| Domain 2: study design | ||
| Theoretical framework | ||
| 9. Methodological orientation and Theory | What methodological orientation was stated to underpin the study? e.g., grounded theory, discourse analysis, ethnography, phenomenology, content analysis | Methods |
| Participant selection | ||
| 10. Sampling | How were participants selected? e.g., purposive, convenience, consecutive, snowball | Methods |
| 11. Method of approach | How were participants approached? e.g., face-to-face, telephone, mail, email | Methods |
| 12. Sample size | How many participants were in the study? | Results |
| 13. Non-participation | How many people refused to participate or dropped out? Reasons? | Results |
| Setting | ||
| 14. Setting of data collection | Where was the data collected? e.g., home, clinic, workplace | Methods |
| 15. Presence of non-participants | Was anyone else present besides the participants and researchers? | Methods |
| 16. Description of sample | What are the important characteristics of the sample? e.g., demographic data, date | Results |
| Data collection | ||
| 17. Interview guide | Were questions, prompts, guides provided by the authors? Was it pilot tested? | Methods |
| 18. Repeat interviews | Were repeat interviews carried out? If yes, how many? | Methods |
| 19. Audio/visual recording | Did the research use audio or visual recording to collect the data? | Methods |
| 20. Field notes | Were field notes made during and/or after the interview or focus group? | None |
| 21. Duration | What was the duration of the inter views or focus group? | Methods |
| 22. Data saturation | Was data saturation discussed? | Methods |
| 23. Transcripts returned | Were transcripts returned to participants for comment and/or correction? | Methods |
| Domain 3: analysis and findings | ||
| Data analysis | ||
| 24. Number of data coders | How many data coders coded the data? | Methods |
| 25. Description of the coding tree | Did authors provide a description of the coding tree? | Methods |
| 26. Derivation of themes | Were themes identified in advance or derived from the data? | Methods |
| 27. Software | What software, if applicable, was used to manage the data? | Methods |
| 28. Participant checking | Did participants provide feedback on the findings? | Methods |
| Reporting | ||
| 29. Quotations presented | Were participant quotations presented to illustrate the themes/findings? Was each quotation identified? e.g., participant number | Results |
| 30. Data and findings consistent | Was there consistency between the data presented and the findings? | Yes, Results |
| 31. Clarity of major themes | Were major themes clearly presented in the findings? | Yes, Results |
| 32. Clarity of minor themes | Is there a description of diverse cases or discussion of minor themes? | Yes, Results |