Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 30;17:153–168. doi: 10.1016/j.omto.2020.03.013

Table 1.

TDO2 Expression in Different Microarray Datasets

Dataset Comparisons Fold Change p Value
Curtis breast invasive ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 2.094 1.4E−162
ductal breast carcinoma in situ versus normal 3.434 8.27E−05
medullary breast carcinoma versus normal 3.658 3.66E−12
invasive breast carcinoma versus normal 2.263 9.79E−07
breast carcinoma versus normal 2.173 0.000258
TCGA breast invasive breast carcinoma versus normal 9.789 1.41E−35
mucinous breast carcinoma versus normal 12.152 3.48E−08
mixed lobular and ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 5.977 2.04E−06
invasive ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 7.576 8.45E−38
invasive lobular breast carcinoma versus normal 3.738 2E−12
male breast carcinoma versus normal 4.212 0.001
Perou breast lobular breast carcinoma versus normal 6.968 0.004
ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 5.071 0.002
Richardson breast 2 ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 5.009 5.61E−11
Sorlie breast 2 ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 4.398 0.001
Sorlie breast ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 4.053 0.002
Radvanyi breast invasive ductal breast carcinoma versus normal 2.347 0.005
Ma breast 4 invasive ductal breast carcinoma stroma versus normal 2.322 0.005
ductal breast carcinoma in situ stroma versus normal 4.825 0.003