Table 2.
Pearson correlations between psychopathological symptoms, health-benefitting factors and emotional attachment to the pet.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSI (1) | ||||||||||||||||||||
| IES-R total (2) | 0.53 | *** | ||||||||||||||||||
| MBIEE (3) | 0.59 | *** | 0.45 | *** | ||||||||||||||||
| MBIDP (4) | 0.37 | *** | 0.27 | *** | 0.58 | *** | ||||||||||||||
| MBIPA (5) | −0.32 | *** | −0.3 | *** | −0.25 | *** | −0.2 | *** | ||||||||||||
| SOC-13 (6) | −0.73 | *** | −0.49 | *** | −0.59 | *** | −0.44 | *** | 0.42 | *** | ||||||||||
| trait-resilience (7) | −0.52 | *** | −0.34 | *** | −0.4 | *** | −0.23 | *** | 0.48 | *** | 0.54 | *** | ||||||||
| LOCinternal (8) | −0.38 | *** | −0.35 | *** | −0.42 | *** | −0.24 | *** | 0.33 | *** | 0.5 | *** | 0.45 | *** | ||||||
| LOCexternal (9) | 0.43 | *** | 0.38 | *** | 0.41 | *** | 0.24 | *** | −0.18 | *** | −0.53 | *** | −0.31 | *** | −0.44 | *** | ||||
| LAPS (10) | 0.27 | *** | 0.29 | *** | 0.14 | * | 0.1 | −0.07 | *** | −0.23 | *** | −0.04 | −0.03 | 0.15 | * | |||||
| Dog owners | 0.34 | *** | 0.36 | *** | 0.14 | 0.13 | −0.07 | −0.024 | *** | 0.01 | 0.08 | 0.13 | ||||||||
| Cat owners | 0.14 | 0.18 | * | 0.11 | −0.001 | 0.02 | −0.016 | −0.05 | −0.07 | 0.13 | ||||||||||
| Z | 1.8 | |||||||||||||||||||
| p adjusted | 0.324 | |||||||||||||||||||
* p < 0.05, *** p < 0.001. Note. GSI = global severity index; IES-R total = Impact of Event Scale-Revised total score; MBIEE/DP/PA = Maslach Burnout Inventory emotional exhaustion (EE)/depersonalization (DP) /personal accomplishment (PA); SOC = sense of coherence; LOC = locus of control; LAPS = Lexington Attachment to Pets Scale.