Table 4.
Remote homology and fold detection performance on the SCOP 1.67 benchmark dataset compared with literature results from GPkernel (Håndstad et al., 2007), LSTM_protein (Hochreiter et al., 2007) and ProDec-BLSTM (Li et al., 2017)
Methods | Superfamily level |
Fold level |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDSMProt a | GPkernel | 0.902 | 0.591 | 0.844 | 0.514 |
LSTM_protein | 0.942 | 0.773 | 0.821 | 0.571 | |
ProDec-BLSTM | 0.969 | 0.849 | — | — | |
Fwd; from scratch | 0.706 | 0.552 | 0.734 | 0.653 | |
Fwd; pretr. | 0.957 | 0.880 | 0.834 | 0.734 | |
Bwd; pretr. | 0.969 | 0.912 | 0.839 | 0.757 | |
Fwd+bwd; pretr. | 0.972 | 0.914 | 0.862 | 0.776 |
Fwd/bwd, training in forward/backward direction; pretr., using language model pre-training. The best-performing classifiers are marked in bold face.
Results established in this work.