Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;22:90. doi: 10.1186/s13075-020-02178-z

Table 3.

Discriminatory ability according to stratification by RA disease characteristics

Sex RF ACPA ACPA/RF bDMARDs
All Male Female Positive Negative Positive Negative Positive Negative Use No use
Cardiovascular risk age 0.68 (0.03) 0.7 (0.05) 0.63 (0.05) 0.68 (0.04) 0.68 (0.08) 0.72 (0.04) 0.61 (0.06) 0.71 (0.04) 0.65 (0.1) 0.78 (0.14) 0.67 (0.03)
Vascular age [H-risk] 0.71 (0.03) 0.72 (0.05) 0.67 (0.04) 0.7 (0.04) 0.77 (0.07) 0.74 (0.04) 0.67 (0.06) 0.74 (0.04) 0.75 (0.08) 0.78 (0.14) 0.71 (0.03)
Vascular age [L-risk] 0.71 (0.03) 0.72 (0.05) 0.67 (0.04) 0.7 (0.04) 0.76 (0.07) 0.74 (0.04) 0.67 (0.06) 0.73 (0.04) 0.74 (0.08) 0.8(0.14) 0.71 (0.03)
Vascular age [HDLc H-risk 0.71 (0.03) 0.71 (0.05) 0.68 (0.04) 0.7 (0.03) 0.78 (0.07) 0.73 (0.04) 0.69 (0.06) 0.72 (0.04) 0.77 (0.08) 0.78 (0.14) 0.71 (0.03)
Vascular age [HDLc L-risk] 0.72 (0.03) 0.72 (0.05) 0.68 (0.04) 0.7 (0.03) 0.76 (0.07) 0.74 (0.04) 0.69 (0.06) 0.73 (0.04) 0.75 (0.08) 0.79 (0.14) 0.71 (0.03)
Glucocorticoids DAS28 RA disease duration Methotrexate sDMARDs
Use No use < 3.2 ≥ 3.2 ≤ 1 year > 1 year Use No use Use No use
Cardiovascular risk age 0.57 (0.08) 0.71 (0.04) 0.6 (0.09) 0.69 (0.04) 0.69 (0.03) 0.6 (0.08) 0.67 (0.09) 0.68 (0.03) 0.62 (0.08) 0.69 (0.03)
Vascular age [H-risk] 0.61 (0.08) 0.74 (0.03) 0.67 (0.09) 0.72 (0.03) 0.73 (0.03) 0.63 (0.08) 0.68 (0.09) 0.72 (0.03) 0.64 (0.08) 0.73 (0.03)
Vascular age [L-risk] 0.59 (0.08) 0.74 (0.03) 0.67 (0.09) 0.71 (0.03) 0.73 (0.03) 0.63 (0.08) 0.7 (0.09) 0.71 (0.03) 0.65 (0.08) 0.72 (0.03)
Vascular age [HDLc H-risk 0.6 (0.08) 0.74 (0.03) 0.66 (0.09) 0.72 (0.03) 0.73 (0.03) 0.63 (0.08) 0.69 (0.09) 0.72 (0.03) 0.65 (0.08) 0.72 (0.03)
Vascular age [HDLc Lrisk] 0.62 (0.08) 0.74 (0.03) 0.67 (0.09) 0.72 (0.03) 0.73 (0.03) 0.64 (0.08) 0.71 (0.09) 0.72 (0.03) 0.66 (0.08) 0.72 (0.03)

Concordance index (standard error) presenting the discriminative ability in ranking individuals who do or do not experience cardiovascular events correctly as high and low risk. Values are presented for various risk age models, including vascular age estimations derived from application of different Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation algorithms with or without use of high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc) for high- and low-risk countries (H-risk and L-risk). Individuals were also stratified according to sex, rheumatoid factor (RF), and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibody (ACPA) positivity, use of biologic or synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs and sDMARDs), disease activity score using 28-joint count (DAS28), and duration of rheumatoid arthritis (RA)

Significance and innovations

• Risk age estimations have been advocated in current guidelines for CVD prevention

• The two proposed risk age models have not been validated

• Our results indicate comparable performance of risk age models in rheumatoid arthritis patients