Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;12:58. doi: 10.1186/s13148-020-00850-4

Table 7.

Association of phenotypic and DNAm-based predictors of smoking, alcohol drinking, BMI and education with mortality

Minimally adjusteda Fully adjustedb
Exposure N HR ll ul P value Nc HR ll ul P value
Self-reported phenotype
 Ever vs never smoker 364 3.29 1.75 6.18 2.22 × 10−4 364 2.21 1.14 4.30 0.019
 Hazardous to harmful drinker vs not 364 1.62 1.06 2.49 0.027 364 1.34 0.86 2.09 0.202
 Higher education vs school education 364 0.81 0.54 1.22 0.320 364 0.87 0.57 1.31 0.503
 BMI 248 0.93 0.87 0.99 0.028 248 0.98 0.92 1.06 0.664
DNAm score
Smoking
  McCartney LASSO (233 CpG sites) 364 1.53 1.24 1.88 7.89 × 10-5 364 1.20 0.94 1.52 0.144
  Trejo Bayesian (59 CpG sites) 364 1.70 1.37 2.11 1.49 × 10-6 364 1.26 0.93 1.72 0.140
AHRR (cg05575921) 364 0.59 0.48 0.74 1.72 × 10-6 364 0.79 0.58 1.07 0.125
Joehanes (FDR) (18,760 CpG sites) 364 1.70 1.34 2.15 1.27 × 10−5 364 1.35 0.99 1.84 0.056
  Joehanes (Bonferroni) (2623 CpG sites) 364 1.67 1.36 2.05 7.57 × 10−7 364 1.38 1.04 1.83 0.025
  Zhang (4 CpG sites) 364 1.48 1.16 1.88 1.48 × 10−3 364 1.28 1.02 1.60 0.036
Alcohol
  Liu (5 CpG sites) 364 1.32 1.10 1.57 2.50 × 10−3 364 1.19 0.97 1.47 0.094
  Liu (23 CpG sites) 364 1.26 1.04 1.52 0.019 364 1.10 0.89 1.36 0.357
  Liu (78 CpG sites) 364 1.25 1.07 1.45 5.02 × 10−3 364 1.20 0.99 1.45 0.067
  Liu (144 CpG sites) 364 1.24 1.07 1.44 5.31 × 10−3 364 1.21 1.00 1.46 0.052
  McCartney LASSO (450 CpG sites) 364 1.28 1.03 1.60 0.024 364 1.05 0.79 1.41 0.723
BMI
  Trejo Bayesian (144 CpG sites) 364 0.78 0.63 0.97 0.024 248 0.77 0.56 1.08 0.132
  McCartney LASSO (1109 CpG Sites) 364 0.85 0.68 1.06 0.146 248 0.77 0.57 1.04 0.093
Education
  McCartney LASSO (373 CpG sites) 364 0.76 0.61 0.96 0.021 364 0.87 0.68 1.12 0.270

N number, HR hazard ratio, ll lower confidence interval, ul upper confidence interval. aSelf-reported phenotypes adjusted for age and gender; epigenetic scores adjusted for age, gender, cell counts and batch effects. bPhenotypes additionally adjusted for clinical variables (TNM stage, HPV status and comorbidity), and a combination of smoking, alcohol intake, education and BMI, as appropriate to the model; risk scores additionally adjusted for clinical variables, the corresponding phenotype predicted by the score of interest and the remaining self-reported phenotypes (excluding BMI). cSample numbers vary due to missing BMI data