Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;8:37. doi: 10.1186/s40359-020-00401-9

Table 2.

Number and percent of non-right-handers (NRH) and right handers (RH) by sample and sex for four handedness direction indicators

Twins Singletons Total
Handedness Direction Male
n (%)
Female
n (%)
χ2(df = 1) Male
n (%)
Female
n (%)
χ2(df = 1) Twins
n (%)
Singletons
n (%)
χ2(df = 1)
Writing hand
 NRH 17 (9.1%) 14 (7.1%) 0.51 19 (8.6%) 14 (6.9%) 0.46 31 (8.1%) 33 (7.8%) 0.02
 RH 170 (90.9%) 183 (92.9%) 201 (91.4%) 190 (93.1%) 353 (91.9%) 391 (92.2%)
Drawing hand
 NRH 26 (13.9%) 21 (10.7%) 0.94 27 (12.3%) 29 (14.2%) 0.35 47 (12.2%) 56 (13.2%) 0.17
 RH 161 (86.1%) 176 (89.3%) 193 (87.7%) 175 (85.8%) 337 (87.8%) 368 (86.8%)
EHI2
 NRH 13 (7.0%) 12 (6.1%) 0.12 20 (9.1%) 16 (7.8%) 0.21 25 (6.5%) 36 (8.5%) 1.13
 RH 174 (93.0%) 185 (93.9%) 200 (90.9%) 188 (92.2%) 359 (93.5%) 388 (91.5%)
PegQ2
 NRH 23 (12.1%) 29 (14.2%) 0.38 40 (18.1%) 25 (12.2%) 2.87 52 (13.2%) 65 (15.3%) 0.71
 RH 167 (87.9%) 175 (85.8%) 181 (81.9%) 180 (87.8%) 342 (86.8%) 361 (84.7%)

1) For the binary classification of ‘writing hand’ and ‘drawing hand’, NRH includes both left-hand preference and no preference

2) EHI2 and PegQ2 are the binary classification of EHI and PegQ scores respectively, using zero as the cutoff point. NRH refers to those who scored less or equal to zero. There are 4 participants (including 1 twin and 3 singletons) who scored exactly zero on EHI