Table 4:
Values of four evaluation criteria obtained by different methods.
| CT | PET | PET&CT | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XmasNet | 0.76 | 0.68 | 0.81 | |
| Radiomics | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | |
| ACC | Proposed CNN | 0.83 | 0.79 | 0.88 |
| MaO-radiomics | 0.82 | 0.80 | 0.82 | |
| Hybrid | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.88 | |
| XmasNet | 0.77 | 0.69 | 0.82 | |
| Radiomics | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.76 | |
| Macro-average | Proposed CNN | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.89 |
| MaO-radiomics | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 | |
| Hybrid | 0.85 | 0.80 | 0.89 | |
| XmasNet | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.91 | |
| Radiomics | 0.87 | 0.84 | 0.86 | |
| Mean-OVA-AUC | Proposed CNN | 0.94 | 0.88 | 0.95 |
| MaO-radiomics | 0.88 | 0.86 | 0.89 | |
| Hybrid | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.95 | |
| XmasNet | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.92 | |
| Radiomics | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.88 | |
| Multi-class-AUC | Proposed CNN | 0.94 | 0.89 | 0.95 |
| MaO-radiomics | 0.89 | 0.86 | 0.89 | |
| Hybrid | 0.94 | 0.91 | 0.95 |