Ultracentrifugation-based isolation techniques |
Density, size, and shape based sequential separations of particulate constituents and solutes |
Large sample capacity and yielding of large amounts of exosomes, but high equipment cost, cumbersome, long run time and high speed centrifugation may damage exosomes |
Low recovery and high specificity |
Size-based isolation techniques |
Size difference between exosomes and other particulate constituents |
Low equipment cost and fast but shear stress induced deterioration and exosomes loss due to attaching to the filter membranes |
Intermediate recovery and intermediate specificity |
Immunoaffinity capture- based techniques |
Specific interaction between membrane-bound antigens (receptors) of exosomes and immobilized antibodies (ligands) |
Suitable for the isolation of specific exosomes with high specificity, but high reagent cost, exosome tags need to be established, low sample capacity and low yields |
Low recovery and high specificity |
Precipitation |
Altering the solubility or dispersibility or exosomes by the use of water-excluding polymers |
Easy to use, no need for special equipment, high sample capacity, but low specificity and co-precipitation of other non-exosomal contaminants like proteins and polymeric materials |
High recovery and low specificity |
Microfluidics-based isolation techniques |
A variety of properties of exosomes like immunoaffinity, size, and density |
Fast, low cost, portable, easy automation and integration, high portability, but low in sample capacity and no isolation standard |
Low recovery and high specificity |