Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 22;40(17):3443–3454. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2359-19.2020

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Prestimulus alpha power and temporary biases. We investigated whether prestimulus alpha power was also modulated by prolonged and short-term temporal recalibration. A, The trials in A200V and V200A conditions were either classified following (Ai) the adapted PSSs (PSSA200V and PSSV200A) or (Aii) the non-adapted PSS (PSSno). The alpha power was computed according to biasness and correctness for these two classifications and averaged across the conjunction cluster derived from the ANOVA and the correlation analysis (Fig. 3A,C). A two-way ANOVA (factors: biasness, correctness) showed that the biasedness factor was significant only when trials were classified according to adapted PSSs (*p < 0.05; n.s., nonsignificant). B, A single-trial model was used to explain the response in the current trial N (respN) based on the current stimulus (stimN) and the previous response (respN-1). The coefficient estimates for each individual (black dots) and the mean across participants (red) are shown. C, The relationship between pre-trial N alpha power and the response of trial N-1 was investigated by splitting trials according to stimulus, response, or biasedness of the response in trials N-1. No significant clusters were found.