Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):595–608. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001745

Table 4.

Regions in which seed-based resting functional connectivity strengths were significantly different between CRPS patients and healthy controls. Note that “seed” clusters were derived from the previous gray matter volume analyses. Locations are in Montreal Neurological Institute space. Significant clusters were formed with cluster-extent thresholding (family-wise error rate) to correct for multiple comparisons.

X Y Z z-statistic cluster cluster size p-value

crps > controls

seed: right putamen
right primary somatosensory cortex 20 −54 64 3.94 1 1545 0.00061
right superior parietal lobe 12 −50 50 3.86

crps < controls

seed: right putamen
right cerebellum crus1 4.48 40 −52 −32 1 1448 0.00099

pain intensity (positive) correlation

seed: left putamen
right primary somatosensory 34 −32 60 3.15 1 735 0.02720
right primary motor cortex 32 −24 54 3.49

dystonia (positive) correlation

seed: left putamen
left supramarginal gyrus −52 −46 24 3.40 1 892 0.01010

Hand coordination, crps > controls

seed: left putamen
left postcentral gyrus −67 −15 20 4.45 1 992 0.00339
left supramarginal gyrus −64 −40 17 3.83
right premotor cortex 48 2 14 4.11 2 1482 0.00069
right precentral gyrus 58 −8 34 3.64
right postcentral gyrus 66 −18 20 3.60

Hand coordination, crps < controls

seed: left putamen
left precuneus −10 −84 52 4.27 1 1893 0.00000
left lateral occipital cortex −30 −80 32 5.39
right cerebellum crus I 42 −74 −28 3.39 2 784 0.03320
right cerebellum crus II 48 −70 −42 3.24

Forearm range of motion, crps < controls

seed: right putamen
left precentral gyrus −60 −4 14 3.80 1 907 0.01620
left postcentral gyrus −50 −16 18 4.34