Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2019 Oct 22;14(12):2701–2712. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00634

Table 2.

Performance of sPDz probes of the P1 and P2 setsa

Probe P1 set
P16:6 P13:9 P19:3 P16:6-teg P13:9-teg P19:3-teg
S/B 4.26±0.05 4.5±0.1 5.8±0.1 5.42±0.04 4.0±0.1 10.47±0.06
SFb 98 100 99 90 51 98
Probe P1 set with a stem-loop
sl-P16:6 sl-P13:9 sl-P19:3 sl-P16:6-teg sl-P13:9-teg sl-P19:3-teg
S/B 1.82±0.03 4.63±0.05 1.31±0.03 3.84±0.06 6.78±0.08 3.32±0.04
SFb 100 99 69 97 91 95
Probe P2 set
P26:6 P23:9 P29:3 P26:6-teg P23:9-teg P29:3-teg
S/B 1.22±0.03 0.9±0.1 1.21±0.02 1.31±0.08 ND 1.92±0.05
SFb 65 66 100 30 ND 66
Probe P2 set with a stem-loop
sl-P26:6 sl-P23:9 sl-P29:3 sl-P26:6-teg sl-P23:9-teg sl-P29:3-teg
S/B 1.49±0.04 0.8±0.3 1.28±0.07 6.95±0.08 1.1±0.4 3.22±0.08
SFb 24 0 16 73 0 70
a

The values for S/B and/or SF indicating poor performance of the probe are in grey. Acceptable probes are bold. “ND” stands for “not determined”;

b

In case of a mathematical value for SF>100%, the SF was made equal to 100%. When the signal triggered by the mismatched target was higher when the signal in the presence of the fully complementary target, the SF was 0.