Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Sep 20.
Published in final edited form as: ACS Chem Biol. 2019 Oct 22;14(12):2701–2712. doi: 10.1021/acschembio.9b00634

Table 3.

Performance of sPDz probes of the P3 seta

Probe S/B SFb
SNS at nt2058 SNS at nt2059
G T C G T C
P36:6 5.8±0.3 26 39 87 50 24 86
P33:9 5.2±0.2 0 0 11 2 3 10
P39:3 7.5±0.2 72 80 100 87 71 100
P36:6-teg 5.3±0.1 0 ND ND 0 ND ND
P33:9-teg 11.81±0.05 3 ND ND 0 ND ND
P39:3-teg 10.3±0.2 22 ND ND 24 ND ND
sl-P36:6 12.1±0.2 75 95 100 90 96 100
sl-P33:9 11.48±0.08 10 ND ND 20 ND ND
sl-P39:3 9.5±0.3 100 98 99 100 97 100
sl-P36:6-teg 8.4±0.2 89 ND ND 95 ND ND
sl-P33:9-teg 16.94±0.04 43 ND ND 65 ND ND
sl-P39:3-teg 11.6±0.2 97 ND ND 100 ND ND
a

The values for S/B and/or SF indicating poor performance of the probe are in grey. Acceptable probes are bold. “ND” stands for “not determined”;

b

In case of a mathematical value for SF>100%, the SF was made equal to 100%. When the signal triggered by the mismatched target was higher when the signal in the presence of the fully complementary target, the SF was 0.