Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 3;25(5):1134. doi: 10.3390/molecules25051134

Table 6.

The use of metal nanoparticles in antimicrobial food packaging.

Metal NP. Packaging Material Food Product Antimicrobial Effectiveness Ref.
Bimetallic silver–copper (Ag–Cu) Polylactide (PLA) + cinnamon EO films Chicken meat PLA films with 4% of bimetallic NPs reduced L. monocytogenes, S. typhimurium counts by 1 log CFU/g and C. jejuni counts by 3 log CFU/g during refrigerated storage for 150 days [107]
Zinc oxide (ZnO) Starch films Fresh-cut mushrooms Films with 3% ZnO exhibited antimicrobial activity against L. monocytogenes, resulting in a reduction of 0.86 log CFU/g after 6 days of storage at 4 °C in polypropylene containers [111]
Titanium oxide (TiO2) Low-density polyethylene (LDPE) Fresh minced meat ZnO nanoparticle (2%)-coated LDPE films were identified as the best case to improve shelf life and prevent E. coli growth in fresh calf minced meat during refrigerated storage for 72 h [112]
Silver Polyvinyl alcohol-montmorillonite blend Chicken sausages Marked reduction (qualitative) of total viable cell counts in chicken sausage samples stored at 4 °C for 4 days [113]
Silver Polyethylene (PE) + clay blend Chicken breast Films containing 5% Ag and 5% TiO2 had the greatest effect on decreasing the microbial load of the chicken sample contaminated with S. aureus for 5 days at 4 °C
Films were more effective in inhibiting the growth of S. aureus than E. coli
[114]
Zinc oxide Polylactide/poly(ε-caprolactone) + clove EO Scrambled eggs The efficacy of the composite films was verified against S. aureus and E. coli inoculated in scrambled egg, and results indicated that the PLA/PEG/PCL/ZnO/CEO film exhibited the highest antibacterial activity during 21 days storage at 4 °C [115]
Zinc oxide Gelatin-chitosan nanofibers composite film Chicken
Cheese
The results showed that the wrapping with nanocomposite film significantly decreased the growth of inoculation bacteria in chicken fillet and cheese samples stored at 4 °C for 12 days
S. aureus and E. coli cell counts (chicken) were reduced by 2 log CFU/g during storage, whereas in cheese samples, P. aeruginosa and E. coli were reduced by only 1 log CFU/g
[116]