Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jul 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Epidemiol. 2019 May 17;35:20–28.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.05.002

Table A4.

Bivariate analyses for exposure-to-exposure, outcome-to-outcome, and exposure-to-outcome differences and correlations among AAWHHS participants (n = 207)

Variable
Allostatic load
Self-reported health
Pearson’s r
Discrimination β 95% CI P-value Good n (%) Not Good n (%) P-value AL EDS
EDS .307 .400 −0.0127
 None −0.126 (−1.048, 0.796) 41 (26) 18 (35)
 Low −0.839 (−1.738, 0.060) 52 (33) 13 (25)
 Moderate (ref) 30 (19) 8 (16)
 High −0.585 (−1.725, 0.556) 21 (14) 5 (10)
 Very high −0.595 (−1.841, 0.650) 12 (8) 7 (14)
EOD .040 .721 −0.0950 0.7430
 None 0.729 (−0.362, 1.819) 16 (10) 6 (12)
 Low −0.517 (−1.279, 0.244) 55 (35) 16 (31)
 Moderate (ref) 49 (31) 14 (27)
 High −0.260 (−1.249, 0.728) 22 (14) 7 (14)
 Very High −1.226 (−2.316, −0.135) 14 (9) 8 (16)
Self-reported health (μ) .694
 Good (n = 156) 5.917 (5.566, 6.268)
 Not good (n = 51) 6.098 (5.481, 6.715)

AAWHHS = African American Women’s Heart & Health Study; β = beta coefficient; CI = confidence interval; SRH = self-reported health; μ = mean.