Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;64(5):e02439-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02439-19

TABLE 2.

Antiviral properties measured as EC50 values for different markers in HBV-infected PHHs

Day, compound Median EC50 (range) (nM) for indicated marker; no of exptsa
Extracellular HBV DNA Total intracellular HBV RNA HBe/cAg HBsAg
Zero
    JNJ-6379 93 (46 to 188); 8 876 (535 to 1,339); 6 960 (794 to 1,326); 8 1,608 (916 to 3,827); 6
    TDF <8.0 (ND); 1 >5,000 (ND); 1 >5,000 (ND); 1 >5,000 (ND); 1
    ETV 0.023 (0.014 to 0.023); 3 >5,000 (>1.0 to >5,000); 17 >5,000 (>1.0 to >5,000); 19 >5,000 (>1.0 to >5,000); 22
4 or 5
    JNJ-6379 102 (52 to 137); 8 >25,000 (>5,000 to >25,000); 8 >25,000 (>5,000 to >25,000); 8 >25,000 (>5,000 to >25,000); 8
    TDF <8.0 (ND); 1 >5,000 (ND); 1 >5,000 (ND); 1 >5,000 (ND); 1
    ETV 0.028 (0.012 to 0.028); 3 >5,000 (>1.0 to >5,000); 23 >5,000 (>1.0 to >5,000); 23 >5,000 (>1.0 to >5,000); 23
a

Stably HBV-replicating HepG2.2.15 cells were the source of HBV for the infection of cryopreserved PHHs. The antiviral properties of each compound were tested in a dose-response assay in HBV-infected PHHs. HBV DNA (extracellular) and HBV RNA (intracellular) levels were assessed using quantitative PCR (qPCR). HBe/cAg and HBsAg in the supernatants were evaluated by AlphaLISA. HBV, hepatitis B virus; PHHs, primary human hepatocytes; EC50, 50% effective concentration; HBe/cAg, hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B core-related antigen; HBsAg, hepatitis B surface antigen; ETV, entecavir; TDF, tenofovir disoproxil; ND, not determined.