Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 21;64(5):e00168-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00168-20

TABLE 2.

MICs of irrational BL-BLI combinations and ceftazidime-avibactam against contemporary Indian ESBL- and/or class C β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales isolatesa

β-Lactam or BL-BLI (dose or ratio) MIC50 (mg/liter) MIC90 (mg/liter)
Ceftriaxone >128 >128
Ceftriaxone + tazobactam (4 mg/liter) 2 128
Ceftriaxone + sulbactam (2:1)b 32 64
Ceftazidime 128 >128
Ceftazidime + tazobactam (4 mg/liter) 4 128
Cefepime 32 >128
Cefepime + tazobactam (4 mg/liter) 0.5 8
Cefepime + sulbactam (4 mg/liter) 4 32
Cefoperazone >128 >128
Cefoperazone + tazobactam (4 mg/liter) 8 128
Cefotaxime >128 >128
Cefotaxime + sulbactam (4 mg/liter) 32 >128
Meropenem 0.06 0.25
Meropenem + sulbactam (4 mg/liter) 0.06 0.12
Ceftazidime + avibactam (4 mg/liter)c 0.5 2
a

Total isolates (n = 103), E. coli (n = 50), Klebsiella spp. (n = 36), Enterobacter spp. (n = 10), Citrobacter spp. (n = 5), Serratia spp. (n = 2). These isolates were collected from various Indian tertiary care hospitals from 2015 to 2018. All the MICs were determined by the agar dilution method as per CLSI guideline M07-A12 (2018) (44). MICs of BLs in the presence of a fixed concentration (8 mg/liter) of a BLI showed similarly high MIC values, except the MIC50 and MIC90 of cefepime-tazobactam, which were 0.5 and 8 mg/liter, respectively.

b

The MIC50 and MIC90 of ceftriaxone-sulbactam combinations in the presence of EDTA (25 mg/liter) were 16 and 32 mg/liter, respectively. The EDTA concentration of 25 mg/liter represents the Cmax attained after administration of CSE 1034 (ceftriaxone at 2 g plus sulbactam at 1 g plus EDTA at 74 mg) (43).

c

One hundred percent of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam based on 2019 CLSI breakpoints.