Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Mar 23.
Published in final edited form as: Atmos Chem Phys. 2020 Mar 23;20(6):3373–3396. doi: 10.5194/acp-20-3373-2020

Table 3.

Statistical analysis of modeled O3 concentration using surface, ozonesonde, aircraft, and satellite observations.

N Mean R NMB NME
Observation Model
 Surface

 – WDCGG 1498 53.9 43.5 0.49*** −19.3% 23.7%
 – CASTNET 2316 53.4 52.9 0.61*** −0.9% 12.6%
 – EANET 240 56.2 49.1 0.49*** −12.6% 20.6%

 Ozonesonde

 US and Canada
 – boundary layer 1016 46.0 42.7 0.70*** −7.1% 16.7%
 – free troposphere 893 87.7 59.6 0.79*** −32.1% 33.8%
 – upper model layer 512 905.1 770.3 0.91*** −14.9% 30.2%

 Asia

 – boundary layer 283 44.2 47.4 0.44*** 7.1% 24.5%
 – free troposphere 207 70.7 59.0 0.43*** −16.5% 21.5%
 – upper model layer 124 529.8 399.2 0.94*** −24.6% 34.4%

 Europe

 – boundary layer 1478 47.6 46.8 0.42*** −1.6% 17.9%
 – free troposphere 1368 78.2 57.2 0.76*** −26.8% 29.1%
 – upper model layer 817 1015.7 894.3 0.94*** −11.9% 24.2%

 Aircraft

 – from the surface up to 6km 128 55.9 45.3 0.74*** −19.0% 19.1%

 Satellite

 – tropospheric column 28020 33.2 34.7 0.65*** 4.7% 13.5%

Note: the unit of mean for observations and simulations is ppbv except satellite observation, which is expressed as DU. Maximum daily 8h average ozone (MD8O3) is used for surface observational data of WDCGG, CASTNET, and EANET. Corresponding hourly modeled O3 is used for ozonesonde data. The 2–4h averaged hourly modeled O3 is used for aircraft data to fully cover each observation time. Significance levels by Student’s t test for correlation coefficients between observations and simulations are marked as

*

p<0.05,

**

p<0.01, and

***

p<0.001, and lack of a mark indicates no significance.