Table 2.
TEA | ALT | AOH | TEN | AME | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Preparation without SPE clean-up and evaluation without ISTD correction | |||||
ME% (sample 1) | 8 | −7 | −20 | 4 | −75 |
ME% (sample 2) | −3 | −3 | −40 | −13 | −86 |
ME% (sample 3) | −5 | −18 | −48 | −14 | −88 |
Relative ME% | 7 | 9 | 22 | 11 | 42 |
Preparation without SPE clean-up and evaluation with ISTD correction | |||||
ME% (sample 1) | 11 | −4 | 11 | 10 | −6 |
ME% (sample 2) | 4 | −6 | 10 | 0 | −11 |
ME% (sample 3) | 5 | −19 | 31 | 2 | 5 |
Relative ME% | 4 | 9 | 10 | 5 | 5 |
Preparation with mixed-mode SPE clean-up and evaluation without ISTD correction | |||||
ME% (sample 1) | 2 | 10 | −45 | 10 | −57 |
ME% (sample 2) | −10 | −8 | −57 | −15 | −50 |
ME% (sample 3) | −13 | 3 | −46 | −18 | −62 |
Relative ME% | 9 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 14 |
Preparation with mixed-mode SPE clean-up and evaluation with ISTD correction | |||||
ME% (sample 1) | 8 | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
ME% (sample 2) | −6 | −7 | 4 | −12 | −3 |
ME% (sample 3) | −6 | 3 | −18 | −4 | −8 |
Relative ME% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 11 | 7 |