Table 2.
Comparison of other methods for microRNAs detection.
| Methods | LOD | Linear Range | Correlation Coefficient (R2) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DNA self-assembled molecular tweezers | 0.6 pM | 1–500 nM | 0.9929 | [25] |
| Graphene oxide for rapid microRNA detection | / | 50–400 nM | 0.9562 | [26] |
| Fluorescence quenching of graphene oxide integrating | 3.0fM | 0.02–100 pM | / | [27] |
| A novel DNA nanomachine based on the linear rolling circle amplification strategy | 87fM | 0.1 pM–0.1 nM | 0.9908 | [13] |
| Highly sensitive determination of microRNA using target-primed and branched rolling-circle amplification | 0.25pM | 0.025 pM–2.5 nM | 0.9994 | [23] |
| Fluorometric determination of microRNA based on strand displacement amplification and rolling circle amplification | 1.04fM | 10 fM–0.1 nM | 0.9957 | [19] |
| Cascade amplification by catalytic DNAzymes | 10pM | 10 pM–100 nM | / | [28] |
| Fluorescence quenching of gold nanoparticles with a competitive hybridization | 33.4fM | 100 fM–1.0 nM | / | [29] |
| DNAzyme-based target-triggered rolling-circle amplification | 0.49pM | 0–25 pM | 0.99106 | This work |