Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Leuk Res. 2018 Oct 25;75:29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2018.10.011

Table 4:

Overall survival of patients (IC vs. HMA) by proportional hazards model using alloSCT as a time-dependent covariate since diagnosis. AML: Acute myeloid leukemia; AML-MRC: AML with myelodysplasia-related changes; CCI: Charlson Comorbidity Index; CI: confidence interval; CK: complex karyotype; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status scores; HMA: Hypomethylating agent; HR: hazard ratio; IC: Intensive chemotherapy; MK: monosomal karyotype; s-AML: secondary AML; t-AML: therapy related AML

No additional adjustment Adjusted for ECOG, CCI, and age
HR (95% CI)
Overall population 0.75 (0.55–1.02) 0.84 (0.60–1.16)
Age group (yrs):
 60–64 0.90 (0.33–2.42) 1.23 (0.40–3.79)
 65–69 1.06 (0.55–2.06) 1.35 (0.67–2.70)
 70–95 0.67 (0.43–1.03) 0.77 (0.48–1.22)
Type of AML:
 s-AML 0.96 (0.58–1.59) 1.17 (0.65–2.10)
 t-AML 0.56 (0.33–0.97) 0.46 (0.25–0.87)
 AML-MRC 0.82 (0.56–1.20) 0.93 (0.63–1.38)
Cytogenetics:
 CK+MK− 0.37 (0.19–0.75) 0.50 (0.22–1.11)
 CK+MK+ 2.00 (1.08–3.70) 2.57 (1.26–5.22)