Table 1.
Multiple Regressions to Predict Total Count Variables of Contact and Help
| Descriptive | Model 1: Contact with neighbors (counta) | Model 2a: Help given (count) | Model 2b: Help received (count) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min–max, mean (SD) | 1 Predictor models (β, t) [R2] | Full model (β, t) | Full model (RR) | Full model (RR) | |
| Age (years) | 61–90, 72.45 (7.10) | .23, 2.06* [.05] | .23, 1.62 | 1.04 | 1.08* |
| Sex (female) | 0–1, 0.62 (0.48) | .10, 0.90 [.01] | .12, 1.05 | 3.07** | 1.36 |
| Household income (scale) | 1–7, 3.83 (1.78) | −.04, −0.30 [.00] | −.06, −0.45 | 1.24 | 1.23 |
| Living alone (yes) | 0–1, 0.48 (0.50) | −.01, −0.08 [.00] | −.07, −0.46 | 1.96 | 1.21 |
| Childlessness (yes) | 0–1, 0.37 (0.48) | −.23, −2.13* [.05] | −.05, −0.35 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Duration of residence in neighborhood (years) | 1–82, 26.68 (18.20) | .11, 0.94 [.01] | .02, 0.13 | 0.98 | 0.97 |
| WHO-5 (scale) | 5–25, 18.63 (3.91) | .09, 0.80 [.01] | .16, 1.37 | 1.10 | 1.09 |
| Health status (scale) | 3–12, 10.98 (1.40) | −.05, −0.48 [.00] | −.03, −0.26 | 0.95 | 1.07 |
| Importance of social contact (scale) | 1–4, 3.26 (0.94) | 0.14, 1.26 [.02] | .12, 0.97 | 1.06 | 0.84 |
| Prioritization of neighbor contact (scale) | 1–6, 4.13 (1.12) | 0.44, 4.30*** [.20] | .30, 2.31** | 1.53* | 1.20 |
| Overall “neighboring” in neighborhood (scale) | 1–4, 2.80 (0.58) | 0.28, 2.59* [.07] | .17, 1.42 | 0.99 | 1.66 |
| Model accuracy | N = 75 R2 = .32 | N = 75 AIC = 206.45 BIC = 233.60 | N = 75 AIC = 167.27 BIC = 194.43 |
Note: AIC = Akaike information criterion; BIC = Bayesian information criterion; missing values included listwise; β = standardized coefficient; t = t value.
aSquare root of aggregated contacts counts.
*p < .05. **p < .01. ***p < .001.