Skip to main content
. 2020 Apr 23;46:52. doi: 10.1186/s13052-020-0818-4

Table 3.

Quality assessment of included studies based on GRADE approach

No. of studies Design Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other
considerations
Abdominal massage Routine Care Pooled effect
Relative
(95% CI)
Final judgment
GRV
3

Randomized

trials

No Serious No Serious No serious indirectness No serious imprecision No serious 17.18/76 19.97/76 −2.11 [−2.78, −1.45]

⦻⦻⦻⦻

High

Number of gastric residual
2

Randomized

trials

No Serious No Serious No serious indirectness Serious imprecisionb No serious 0.32/25 0.35/24 −0.05 [− 0.34, 0.24]

⦻⦻⦻◯

Moderate

Vomiting frequency
2

Randomized

trials

No Serious Very serious inconsistencya No serious indirectness No serious imprecision No serious 0.16/44 1.17/43 −0.84 [−1.37, − 0.31]

⦻⦻◯◯

Low

Abdominal circumference
4

Randomized

trials

No Serious Very serious inconsistencya No serious indirectness Serious imprecisionb No serious 24.53/86 26.30/85 −1.51 [−4.86, 1.84]

⦻◯◯◯

Very low

a I2 is higher than 40%, b Not met optimal information size/ CI is very wide